Where does it say a TV is not legal? I'll wait for you, I'm having trouble finding that in the rulebook too... I don't see legal holds defined anywhere in the rulebook either. 7-1-5 is not an all-inclusive...
I'd say if it's that close, then no problem. Or maybe since they were in the victory formation, you could cheat up a little bit and get a better view.
(I've never been a BJ)
QUOTE: ----- Originally posted by CTRefJay: 8-3-9...After a try, the opponent of the scoring team shall designate which team will kick off. I haven't asked the opposing coach ONCE whether or not he wants...
QUOTE: ----- Originally posted by Penguin: I believe you must deem a "try" for this not to be a violation. If you do not deem that a "try" was made - it is a violation. ----- Rule reference, please.
I bet if you started ejecting players for those hits, they would stop right away. How many times in your high school games have you heard coaches yell to players to "use your hat."? I hear it all the...
I could have sworn this situation was addressed in the case book several years ago... Maybe I read it in Officials' Quarterly, but I thought it was the case book some time around 2002 or 2003.
Same as Bob. It's likely that someone on the floor is going to stop what they are doing because of the horn. Get it straightened out and then resume play.
There is no infraction - entirely legal - keep playing. Re: Rule 12,7,ART 1 ...provided the teammate is outside the penalty area and the ball is not returned to the keeper with the foot. From USSF, ADVISE...
I agree that it should be a violation, but have some issues with how that interpretation is arrived at. Note under 9.2.10 states that the thrower may penetrate provided he/she does not touch the inbounds...
alex7 - it's assumed that all umpire evaluators are quality evaluators. And every one of them has their own opinions about HOW to call balls and strikes. As long as I call a consistent strike zone within...
QUOTE: ----- Originally posted by Nevadaref: 1) So did your partner just fail to hear the request? It seems that several other people were aware of it. 2. Nope, it's another episode of The Cranky Guy...
